View Article

Current Articles | Categories | Search | Syndication

Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Dual vs Quad Core Gaming
By John @ 5:15 AM :: 17781 Views :: 11 Comments :: :: Tech Knowledge
 

 

 The MSI X38 Diamond Motherboard

 

 

The MSI X38 Diamond was not my first choice of motherboard for this article. I was grateful to MSI, however, for providing me with this fantastic board. One of the key features to this motherboard is the support of DDR3 and the support of the required 133FSB needed for this testing. The original board I chose was the MSI P6N Diamond with the Nforce 680i chipset. Unfortunately, the board required a hardware modification to support the quad core CPU. Although it has been fixed now, the rework was not available at the time I wanted to do my testing.

 

The X38 Diamond is an enthusiasts' dream. This board has heatpipe cooling across the X38 chipset which MSI call Circu-Pipe. This cooling provides a completely silent cooling system for the chipset and it also looks very sexy. It's finished off in a polished copper look.

It also has TroubleShoot Poster, which is a set of four LEDs that provide debugging information during boot-up. The readout will identify things like faulty RAM, CPU or video card, providing a much quicker way to find the root of a problem. I've been using a PCI card version of this exact same tool for many years and to see it built into a motherboard is very cool.

MSI's box also boasts about made-in-Japan solid capacitors. Solid capacitors apparently have a life span of up to six times those of liquid capacitors. Anybody whose been around the traps for a while will remember seeing more than their fair share of popped capacitors, a rampant problem through the industry just a few years ago.

Another very cool feature set, for me, or anybody having to set up a test system, are the onboard power and reset buttons. This board is basically designed for me! I could not personally have requested any extra features. Those two little buttons are right next door to four SATA II ports supporting Matrix RAID and behind them is another two that can support RAID 0/1.

One of the other features which you may notice from the photos, is the amount of PCIe slots that this board has. The board supports two PCIe 2.0 x16 which fully support ATI's Crossfire technology. It also has two PCIe 1.0 x4 and one standard PCI slot. Plus it has another two full length x16 slots but here's the catch - they only support 4x speeds. The marketing on the motherboard box might deceive a few people who think they're getting four PCIe slots that run at the full x16 speed since they call all this "Quad PCI Express x16 slots". Interesting creative marketing there! I mentioned that the board will support Crossfire. It does not support NVIDIA's SLi.

Looking at the back panel you can see al of the extras - well beyond what you'd see on an average board. There are eight USB ports, two eSATA ports, one 1394 port, two Gigabit LAN ports, optic fibre audio, a full set of 7.1 audio connectors and for all you retro keyboard and mice users, there's even PS2 connectors.

The motherboard is made within a dark chocolate PCB. Anybody doing an extreme case mod would not be disappointed with the look of this PCB - on both sides.

Being an MSI enthusiast board, the X38 Diamond features MSI's well known Core Cell technology.

The board I received came with five fan headers and a missing sixth system fan header, which might be an option on certain revisions of the board. Five fan headers are more than ample for providing any system with all the cooling it would need.

Overall, this board was able to do everything I asked it to do. I didn't use it for any overclocking, since that wasn't what I was testing in this article, but I couldn't help but notice that it has all of the features that you'd need for overclocking and tweaking. The MSI X38 Diamond is by far one of the nicest boards I've had the pleasure of working on in quite some time. I experienced 100% stability during all of the testing. It didn't miss a beat. If you're looking for a high end motherboard and SLi is not a requirement, then this board would be able to provide you with all the PC tweaking glory you could possibly want.

 

Previous Page | Next Page
Rating

Comments
By Scyphe @ Thursday, May 01, 2008 9:28 AM
For gaming and non-intensive desktop work a higher frequency dualcore CPU is a better choice than a quadcore. Besides, the new 45nm E8x00-series of Dualcore CPU's are cheap and easily overclocks better than equivalent quadcores which gives the price/performance-prize to Intel's current C2D's. It will change once developers have got the right tools to make truly multithreaded applications. In 2009 we should see a majority of top-tier games being truly multithreaded for more than 2 cores. I hope.

By provoko @ Thursday, May 01, 2008 8:23 PM
i liked your conclusion

thanks for the tests

By daemon @ Friday, May 02, 2008 5:27 AM
Why do a one sided arguement? Testing of games such as UT3 and Supreme Commander should have been added to see real world benefits from quad core cpus.

By John @ Friday, May 02, 2008 5:46 AM
So you want me to Hunt out games that are optimized for quad cores and test them?

I know there are games out there that are optimized and I even play UT on my Core 2 Duo 6700 and it run smooth as silk on 2 cores with max settings. What makes you think it will run smoother with 4? I did start to test Supreme Commander but we had problems testing it with fraps – it wouldn’t give consistent results. Feel free to list any other games that are optimized for Quad cores. If the list gets big enough it might make me think twice about recommending people spend 5x the price on a CPU….

By blzd @ Friday, May 02, 2008 9:07 AM
World in Conflict does take advantage of more then 2 threads, and the developers of Crysis insist it does too, but as you can see it makes little difference in the end. People like to buy quads because its the next step, eventually people will have to go quad, but for now it does little for gamers.

Only thing I would disagree with is that quads cost alot more, Q6600 and 6700 are selling for very cheap, only $30 or $70 more then an e8400, not to mention only $195 for the cheapest Phenom, slightly cheaper then an E8400.

By kilroy67 @ Friday, May 02, 2008 4:51 PM
Good article john. But I disagree with your comment that Quads cost 5 times more then Dual core. Currently the Q6600 goes for $219 here in the USA. The charm of this CPU is its ability to overclock easily to 3GHZ on air!! If one is looking to future proof ones machine,then I cant see buying a dual core CPU when for $20-$40 more they can have a quad core. More and more games are coming out with multi-threaded support and take full advantage of 4 cores or more.

By kurmis @ Friday, May 02, 2008 10:19 PM
"The megahertz race came to an end with Intel's limit of 3.4GHz with their Prescott core""

Prescott was maxed out at 3.6 and prescott extreme at 3.8 so its higher than 3.4

By Criswell @ Saturday, May 03, 2008 1:37 AM
This article is stupid. Who cares about the numbers, I don't even read the results..

I just know that on my Quad Core I can game just as fine as I used to, if not better on particular games. But on the other hand, with the Quad Core I can now Fold for the cure AND play my games at the same time. I definitely could not do that previously with my E6700.

By Nonfanboy @ Monday, May 05, 2008 12:38 AM
You got to love the fan boys that take the time to post a comment about an article but do not take the time to read it Criswell your comment make yo look stupid. The article confirms that quad core is faster in multi tasking and its not about seeing what is faster its about showing people how the CPU cores work in gaming. Take the blinkers off kid.

By Matt @ Friday, May 09, 2008 9:00 PM
Correct me if I wrong, but the two processors tested were the QX6850 and the E6850. The QX is Intel Extreme Processor which is supposed to be the speed demon for gaming and HD video editing. The above test shows that an ordinary 2 core can go the distance against the Extreme CPU. The extreme CPU's are 5x more expensive.

By Scyphe @ Friday, May 09, 2008 11:50 PM
Actually, the X in Intel's model-scheme signifies that the multiplier is unlocked, aimed at enthusiasts who want to overclock to the max. Other than that they're the same as the non-X versions. It's marketing.

Click here to post a comment